EVERWELL

Nuts have been around forever, but so has the debate: if they’re packed with fat and calories, how can they be good for you? For years, nutrition experts have gone back and forth on this question. Now, a major new umbrella review, essentially a mega-analysis of existing research, has given us one of the clearest answers yet. In this article, we’ll break down what the science says and how a simple handful of nuts a day can make a big difference to your health. What Exactly Is an Umbrella Review? Think of it as the ultimate summary. Instead of running one experiment, scientists look at all the top-quality studies and meta-analyses ever done on a topic and combine their results. It’s the “study of studies,” giving a bird’s-eye view that helps cut through conflicting data and highlight what’s really true. This method is especially powerful for questions like this, ones that have been studied for decades but still cause confusion. And in this case, it’s helped confirm what many dietitian...

Food allergies are rising worldwide, ranging from mild sensitivities to severe anaphylaxis. Studies show this increase varies across regions and populations, highlighting environmental and dietary influences beyond genetics. In developed countries, about 8 percent of children and 10 percent of adults have at least one food allergy. In Europe, up to one in five people report symptoms, but confirmed cases are closer to 0.8 percent. In the United States, around one in thirteen children and one in ten adults have a clinically verified allergy. In Asia, rates differ widely, from 0.14 percent in India to 1.5 percent in Hong Kong. Children born in Hong Kong show higher allergy rates than those who immigrated from mainland China, suggesting that early-life environmental exposure affects immune tolerance. These differences point to one major player: the gut , which regulates how the body interacts with its environment. The Gatekeeper’s Failure: How a Leaky Gut Opens the Door to Allergies T...

  The Protein Puzzle In today’s world of fitness and nutrition, “eat more protein” has become a common mantra. It is praised for building muscle, keeping hunger away, and helping with weight loss. High-protein diets dominate both gyms and wellness blogs. Yet a growing body of research is quietly asking an unsettling question: could eating less protein actually help us live longer? This idea challenges decades of nutritional advice and forces a rethink of what “healthy” eating really means. On one side lies the short-term benefit of strength and muscle maintenance. On the other is the possibility that long-term health and lifespan might improve when protein intake is limited. The debate is more than academic. It touches on how we balance vitality today with longevity tomorrow. The Great Protein Debate: Two Sides of the Same Coin Nutrition science has rarely been more divided. Some researchers and dietitians promote high-protein diets for their clear benefits in body composition...

  Introduction: The Doubling Problem Over the last several decades, two global health trends have moved in concerning parallel. The first is the dramatic rise in the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which now account for over half the calories consumed in countries like the US, UK, and Canada. The second is a documented and steep decline in male reproductive health, with global sperm counts falling by approximately 60% since the 1970s. This has led researchers to a critical question: Are the negative health effects of UPFs simply a matter of people eating more calories and gaining weight, or are calories from ultra-processed foods fundamentally different in how they impact our bodies, leading to harm that calorie-counting alone cannot explain? A groundbreaking new clinical trial, published in the high-impact scientific journal  Cell Metabolism , was designed to finally answer this question. This article will break down the study's clever design, explain what the re...